Sunday, January 03, 2010

Did David Bell Suck?

Last week Corey posted his version of the Phillie's worst batters of the decade and representing thirdbase was David Bell. Corey dislikes Bell, I dislike Bell, most of Phillies Nation dislikes Bell. He wasn't horrible, yet somehow he was. Here's what Corey wrote...
David Bell – If you look back at David Bell’s stats, it may not be evident why he is on this list. His second season with the Phils he hit .291 with 18 homers. Of course, the year before he hit .195. And the year after hitting .291 he was second in the league in grounding into double plays. But it wasn’t just that David Bell sucked, it was how David Bell sucked. There was just something about him that many of us didn’t like. The way he swung a bat. The way he fielded a ball. The way he threw the ball to first. It was all very unappealing. And we had to listen to company man Chris Wheeler verbally copulate Bell every time he did anything remotely adequate. When someone spends so much time trying to convince the listening audience that a player doesn’t suck, there is a good chance he actually does.

One reader didn't agree with that analysis...
David Bell was worth 25 million dollars as a Phillie. They paid him 16 million. Vastly underappreciated, is more like it. ~DKulich

My take- David Bell hit .258/.715 in 4 seasons with the Phils while playing poor defense. Between 2004-2005 he made 45 errors at 3rd, and it's not like he made up for it with his thunderous stick either. I hated how Wheels always preached that Bell "did all the little things right", because if by little he meant hitting into 56 rally-killing double plays while only hitting 38 homeruns during his time with Philly, then yes, he's the f'n King of Little Things. Bottom line, I don't care what any fancy statistical metric for measuring players true worth says about David Bell, he sucked and was not worth the years or money the Phils laid on the table for him (4 yr $16M), especially not a preposterous $25M over that span.
Did David Bell suck?
Yes, Abso'f'n'lutley
No, Vastly Unappreciated
  
pollcode.com free polls

8 comments:

Bob D said...

Not to mention that all of the other 3rd basemen of that decade were so much better. At least we have Polanco back after an ill-advised trade of him. I wish we did have Polly around the last 4 years at 3rd.

Preserve Jon said...

Happy New Year fellas. I'm back from vacay to try to reclaim my rightful place at the top of the "Name that Player" pantheon.

Are you as excited for the Danys Baez era as I am? I have visions of Jose Mesa dancing in my dreams.

GM-Carson said...

Baez- meh. Corey or I will probably do a post about him soon, but I'm simply just not motivated to do so at this moment.

Reverend Paul Revere said...

DKulich had to be taking drugs during the David Bell era, right?

Bob D said...

Baez could be good if he recovers from his injuries. However it is questionable on how good. His last 2 years have been bad and so-so. I find him being slotted as the 4/5th reliever behind Lidge, Romero, Madson, and Durbin. They all have potential to pitch great (see2008), but recent track history shows they all are backslidding a bit (see 2009).
My guess is the bullpen will have a few good pitchers but also a few Joe Table types. Hopefully a few of the young pitchers will step up this year.

Utility Derek said...

remember Bell took steroids too. Thats weak!

sdfj said...

christian louboutin christian louboutin cheap christian louboutin sale christian louboutin discount christian shoes christian louboutin shoes designer handbags louis vuitton handbags replica handbags ugg classic tall ugg classic short ugg ultra tall boots christian louboutin boots MBT shoes discount MBTshoes ugg classic cardy boots ugg boots Tory Burch Shoes Giuseppe Zanotti Shoes louboutin ugg boot

Anonymous said...

I am Glad i discovered this web site.Added pabaseball.blogspot.com to my bookmark!